CVE-2026-98581

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: llcp: Fix list corruption / refcount desync in nfc_llcp_recv_dm() nfc_llcp_recv_dm() handles DM(NOBOUND)/DM(REJ) for a socket that is still linked on local->connecting_sockets: it looks the socket up with nfc_llcp_connecting_sock_get(), sets sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED and returns, without taking the socket lock and without unlinking the socket from the connecting_sockets list. llcp_sock_release() selects the list to unlink from by sk_state: a socket in LLCP_CONNECTING is unlinked from connecting_sockets, otherwise from the sockets list. Because recv_dm left the socket physically on connecting_sockets but in the LLCP_CLOSED state, release() takes the else branch and calls nfc_llcp_sock_unlink(&local->sockets, sk). That runs sk_del_node_init() while holding sockets.lock, i.e. it removes the socket from the connecting_sockets hlist under the wrong lock. A concurrent connect() linking another socket onto connecting_sockets under connecting_sockets.lock then mutates the same hlist unserialized, which corrupts the list and desyncs the sk_add_node()/sk_del_node_init() sock_hold()/__sock_put() pairing. An unprivileged local process holding LLCP sockets, with the DM supplied by the remote peer over an established LLCP link, can drive this to leak kernel sockets without bound (the mis-decrement goes through the non-freeing __sock_put() path, so the object is never released), leading to memory exhaustion / DoS. This is the same class of bug that was fixed in the sibling handler nfc_llcp_recv_cc() by commit b493ea2765cc ("nfc: llcp: Fix use-after-free race in nfc_llcp_recv_cc()"); recv_dm did not receive the equivalent fix. Fix it the same way: take lock_sock(), re-check that the socket is still hashed (release() may have won the race), and for the NOBOUND/REJ case unlink it from connecting_sockets before moving it to LLCP_CLOSED. The unlink drops the connecting_sockets membership reference via sk_del_node_init(), leaving the socket unhashed, so the later nfc_llcp_sock_unlink() in llcp_sock_release() becomes a no-op and no double put occurs.

Why is this CVE medium priority?

See ubuntu cvss score

Learn more about Ubuntu priority

• How can I get the fixes?
• What do statuses mean?
• Patch details

Get expanded security coverage with Ubuntu Pro

Reduce your average CVE exposure time from 98 days to 1 day with expanded CVE patching, ten-years security maintenance and optional support for the full stack of open-source applications. Free for personal use.

Patch details

Severity score breakdown

CVSS version: CVSS v4.0

References

• MITRE
• NVD
• Launchpad
• Debian

Related Ubuntu Security Notices (USN)

• USN-8961-1
• Linux kernel vulnerabilities
• 3 November 2026
• USN-8959-1
• Linux kernel vulnerabilities
• 3 November 2026
• USN-8963-1
• Linux kernel (NVIDIA Tegra) vulnerabilities
• 3 November 2026
• USN-8960-1
• Linux kernel (OEM) vulnerabilities
• 3 November 2026

Other references

• https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-98581
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7fb2c0eeb79bfad64065f539a453138abd0edda6
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dba1d9c7134afcb4b1bfad8c1b1b3f0ab5189b08
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd2d24add86b3b63cd87cf2feff98ae119ba19a6
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf1460acdf8cf5a07c819f59785d40f20d113099
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/812731dd8511f5768f4ff279b3c18d85cd21da4b
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/320a2ff49bdce3f9a437b9a9ff341ff27d3bdbf1
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b94cf09720543cc34256c7aa88f8059cbe7c0419
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1e9ed52a6697354366dddf190fbacee8ed2f7c5